Support this proposal. A 50% super quorum reflects clear consensus from the community and helps governance move forward efficiently without unnecessary delays. Thanks, Hal.
Committee
Private
Posts
-
Proposal to Set DAO Super Quorum to 50% of Total Voting Power at Snapshot -
Decentralized Governance Incentive Framework Proposal@Apxymous We certainly will use the allocation from departed core contributors if this proposal passes. We will have a vote at TGE to decide how much of the CTMDAOVOTE tokens convert to veCTM and therefore how much ex core contributors will receive, but in this proposal, it is suggested that it will only be a small amount, capped at 0.1% (100k veCTM).
-
Decentralized Governance Incentive Framework ProposalI don’t know what was promised before they joined. If they were promised already they should receive for their work. There is only 3% left for future contributors. If we gonna use up to 2% until TGE then there isn’t much left for future contributors. If we can use “some” of the allocation from the departed core contributors then we don’t have to use the 3% what’s left.
-
Decentralized Governance Incentive Framework Proposal@Selqui Ah, okay. Well I didn’t know Arkman was working over a year now and only received so less. But there is only 3% left from the 15% for Core contributors? Is that correct? I still think these numbers are on the big side and risky incase these contributors want exit. After Losing 50% with penalty they still got a big size to dump. I rather have them vested started at day1 TGE. Like giving them 50k veCTM per month instead of 500k in one go.
-
Decentralized Governance Incentive Framework Proposal@Apxymous Hal did the smart contracts part and he is developing the Governance frontend at the moment. He may incorporate a newer version of the staking into this new Governance frontend
-
Decentralized Governance Incentive Framework ProposalI thought hal0177 did the staking page? Or are hal0177 and arkman the same person?
